Infatica wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested Jun 1, 2026.
Infatica wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Infatica for most teams that need solid performance with 15m+ residential ips, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
On the entry tier, 922Proxy is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. 922Proxy starts at $0.04/GB and Infatica starts at $4.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
922Proxy has the larger advertised residential pool. 922Proxy reports 200M+ IPs across 190+ countries; Infatica reports 15M+ IPs across 195+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Infatica edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — 922Proxy is typically picked for residential workloads, while Infatica is often chosen for datacenter use cases.
Infatica carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only 922Proxy gates dedicated account managers and Infatica gates them on enterprise tiers.
Pick 922Proxy when 922Proxy (922 S5 Proxy) was a pay-per-IP SOCKS5 residential proxy provider — its primary domain no longer reso. Pick Infatica when Solid performance with 15M+ residential IPs. Most teams that consider both end up with Infatica.
We use functional cookies to remember your theme and a single analytics cookie to count anonymous page views. Affiliate links may also drop a 3rd-party cookie on click. Learn more.