The verdict
Webshare wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Webshare for most teams that need cheap residential + datacenter proxies with country, state, and now city-level targeting (newly rolled out 2026). genuine 10-proxy free tier and self-serve onboarding in 60 seconds., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
Bardeen vs Webshare — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, Bardeen or Webshare?
On the entry tier, Webshare is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Bardeen starts at $10.00/GB and Webshare starts at $0.99/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, Bardeen or Webshare?
Webshare has the larger advertised residential pool. Bardeen reports No-code agentic scraper (no proxy network) across multiple+ countries; Webshare reports 80M+ residential + 30M+ datacenter IPs across 195+ countries across 195+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, Bardeen or Webshare?
Webshare edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Bardeen is typically picked for No-code agentic web scraper workloads, while Webshare is often chosen for datacenter use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, Bardeen or Webshare?
Webshare carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Bardeen gates dedicated account managers and Webshare gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick Bardeen or Webshare in 2026?
Pick Bardeen when AI agentic web scraper and no-code automation platform for sourcing, qualifying, and enriching sales leads.. Pick Webshare when Cheap residential + datacenter proxies with country, state, and now city-level targeting (newly rolled out 202. Most teams that consider both end up with Webshare.