The verdict
Blurpath wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied. We'd pick Blurpath for most teams that need anonymous browsing proxies, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
Blurpath vs CoProxy — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, Blurpath or CoProxy?
On the entry tier, CoProxy is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Blurpath starts at $3.00/GB and CoProxy starts at $2.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, Blurpath or CoProxy?
Blurpath has the larger advertised residential pool. Blurpath reports 500K+ IPs across 50+ countries; CoProxy reports 300K+ IPs across 40+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, Blurpath or CoProxy?
Blurpath edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Blurpath is typically picked for residential workloads, while CoProxy is often chosen for datacenter use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, Blurpath or CoProxy?
Blurpath carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Blurpath gates dedicated account managers and CoProxy gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick Blurpath or CoProxy in 2026?
Pick Blurpath when Anonymous browsing proxies. Pick CoProxy when Shared and dedicated proxies. Most teams that consider both end up with Blurpath.