Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Blurpath vs Floppydata Proxy.

Floppydata Proxy wins on 2 of 7 core metrics, 4 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 16, 2026.

Compared
Blurpath logo
Blurpath
3.4 ★ · Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies from ~$0.5/GB.
Floppydata Proxy logo
Floppydata Proxy
3.4 ★ · Dubai-based budget proxy provider (since 2024) offering residential, mobile, datacenter and ISP proxies from $0.60/GB across 195+ locations.
Rating
3.4 / 5
3.4 / 5
Trust score
7.0 / 10
7.0 / 10
Starts at
$0.50/GB
$0.60/GB
IP pool
60M+ residential IPs
65M+ IPs claimed (disputed; some sources cite ~10M residential)
Locations
190+ countries
195+ countries
Success rate
96%
96%
Avg response
1,200 ms
1,200 ms
Founded
2,022
2,021
HQ
USA
USA
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Browser ext.
— No
✓ Yes
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Floppydata Proxy wins on 2 of 7 core metrics, 4 tied. We'd pick Floppydata Proxy for most teams that need dubai-based budget proxy provider (since 2024) offering residential, mobile, datacenter and isp proxies from $0.60/gb across 195+ locations., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Blurpath vs Floppydata Proxy — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Blurpath or Floppydata Proxy?

On the entry tier, Blurpath is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Blurpath starts at $0.50/GB and Floppydata Proxy starts at $0.60/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Blurpath or Floppydata Proxy?

Floppydata Proxy has the larger advertised residential pool. Blurpath reports 60M+ residential IPs across 190+ countries; Floppydata Proxy reports 65M+ IPs claimed (disputed; some sources cite ~10M residential) across 195+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Blurpath or Floppydata Proxy?

Floppydata Proxy edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Blurpath is typically picked for ["Residential" workloads, while Floppydata Proxy is often chosen for ["Residential" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Blurpath or Floppydata Proxy?

Blurpath carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Blurpath gates dedicated account managers and Floppydata Proxy gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Blurpath or Floppydata Proxy in 2026?

Pick Blurpath when Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies fro. Pick Floppydata Proxy when Dubai-based budget proxy provider (since 2024) offering residential, mobile, datacenter and ISP proxies from $. Most teams that consider both end up with Floppydata Proxy.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut