Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Blurpath vs Proxy4U.

Even split — pick on price or use case based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 16, 2026.

Compared
Blurpath logo
Blurpath
3.4 ★ · Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies from ~$0.5/GB.
Proxy4U logo
Proxy4U
3.4 ★ · Pay-as-you-go proxy provider with 90M+ residential, mobile and datacenter IPs across 90+ countries, no monthly fees or expiry dates.
Rating
3.4 / 5
3.4 / 5
Trust score
7.0 / 10
7.0 / 10
Starts at
$0.50/GB
$0.99/GB
IP pool
60M+ residential IPs
90M+ IPs worldwide (residential network)
Locations
190+ countries
90+ countries
Success rate
96%
96%
Avg response
1,200 ms
1,100 ms
Founded
2,022
2,020
HQ
USA
Germany
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
✓ Yes
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Even split — pick on price or use case. We'd pick Blurpath for most teams that need hong kong-based proxy vendor offering 60m+ residential ips plus isp, datacenter, mobile and socks5 proxies from ~$0.5/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Blurpath vs Proxy4U — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Blurpath or Proxy4U?

On the entry tier, Blurpath is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Blurpath starts at $0.50/GB and Proxy4U starts at $0.99/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Blurpath or Proxy4U?

Proxy4U has the larger advertised residential pool. Blurpath reports 60M+ residential IPs across 190+ countries; Proxy4U reports 90M+ IPs worldwide (residential network) across 90+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Blurpath or Proxy4U?

Proxy4U edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Blurpath is typically picked for ["Residential" workloads, while Proxy4U is often chosen for ["Residential" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Blurpath or Proxy4U?

Blurpath carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Blurpath gates dedicated account managers and Proxy4U gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Blurpath or Proxy4U in 2026?

Pick Blurpath when Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies fro. Pick Proxy4U when Pay-as-you-go proxy provider with 90M+ residential, mobile and datacenter IPs across 90+ countries, no monthly. Most teams that consider both end up with either based on price or specific use-case fit.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut