Skip to content
Head to head

Blurpath vs Proxy5.

Blurpath wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Aug 23, 2026.

Compared
Blurpath logo
Blurpath
3.4 ★ · Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies from ~$0.5/GB.
Proxy5 logo
Proxy5
3.4 ★ · Proxy5 is a datacenter IPv4 proxy provider operating since 2019, offering private, shared datacenter, ISP, and rotating proxies with HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5 support. Entry pricing starts at $3 per proxy, with a free 1-hour trial and a 24-hour refund window.
Rating
3.4 / 5
3.4 / 5
Trust score
7.0 / 10
6.1 / 10
Starts at
$0.50/GB
$3.00/GB
IP pool
60M+ residential IPs
150,000+ unique IPs across 500+ Class C subnets
Locations
190+ countries
0+ countries
Success rate
96%
Avg response
1,200 ms
Founded
2,022
2,019
HQ
USA
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
✓ Yes
Verified
✓ Yes
— No

The verdict

Blurpath wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Blurpath for most teams that need hong kong-based proxy vendor offering 60m+ residential ips plus isp, datacenter, mobile and socks5 proxies from ~$0.5/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Blurpath vs Proxy5 — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Blurpath or Proxy5?

On the entry tier, Blurpath is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Blurpath starts at $0.50/GB and Proxy5 starts at $3.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Blurpath or Proxy5?

Blurpath has the larger advertised residential pool. Blurpath reports 60M+ residential IPs across 190+ countries; Proxy5 reports 150,000+ unique IPs across 500+ Class C subnets across multiple+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Blurpath or Proxy5?

Blurpath edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Blurpath is typically picked for residential workloads, while Proxy5 is often chosen for datacenter use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Blurpath or Proxy5?

Blurpath carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Blurpath gates dedicated account managers and Proxy5 gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Blurpath or Proxy5 in 2026?

Pick Blurpath when Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies fro. Pick Proxy5 when Proxy5 is a datacenter IPv4 proxy provider operating since 2019, offering private, shared datacenter, ISP, and. Most teams that consider both end up with Blurpath.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut