Blurpath wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested Jul 9, 2026.
Blurpath wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Blurpath for most teams that need hong kong-based proxy vendor offering 60m+ residential ips plus isp, datacenter, mobile and socks5 proxies from ~$0.5/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
On the entry tier, Blurpath is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Blurpath starts at $0.50/GB and Proxy5 starts at $3.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Blurpath has the larger advertised residential pool. Blurpath reports 60M+ residential IPs across 190+ countries; Proxy5 reports 150,000+ unique IPs across 500+ Class C subnets across multiple+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Blurpath edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Blurpath is typically picked for ["Residential" workloads, while Proxy5 is often chosen for ["Datacenter" use cases.
Blurpath carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Blurpath gates dedicated account managers and Proxy5 gates them on enterprise tiers.
Pick Blurpath when Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies fro. Pick Proxy5 when Proxy5 is a datacenter IPv4 proxy provider operating since 2019, offering private, shared datacenter, ISP, and. Most teams that consider both end up with Blurpath.
We use functional cookies to remember your theme and a single analytics cookie to count anonymous page views. Affiliate links may also drop a 3rd-party cookie on click. Learn more.