Skip to content
Head to head

Blurpath vs ProxyShare.

Even split — pick on price or use case based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Aug 23, 2026.

Compared
Blurpath logo
Blurpath
3.4 ★ · Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies from ~$0.5/GB.
ProxyShare logo
ProxyShare
3.4 ★ · ProxyShare is a Hong Kong-based proxy provider offering rotating and static residential, datacenter, and long-acting ISP proxies from a pool of 75M+ IPs across 195+ locations, priced pay-per-GB from $0.67/GB, with HTTP/SOCKS5 support and web scraping APIs.
Rating
3.4 / 5
3.4 / 5
Trust score
7.0 / 10
6.1 / 10
Starts at
$0.50/GB
$0.67/GB
IP pool
60M+ residential IPs
75M+ residential IPs
Locations
190+ countries
195+ countries
Success rate
96%
Avg response
1,200 ms
Founded
2,022
HQ
USA
Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
✓ Yes
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
✓ Yes
Verified
✓ Yes
— No

The verdict

Even split — pick on price or use case. We'd pick Blurpath for most teams that need hong kong-based proxy vendor offering 60m+ residential ips plus isp, datacenter, mobile and socks5 proxies from ~$0.5/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Blurpath vs ProxyShare — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Blurpath or ProxyShare?

On the entry tier, Blurpath is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Blurpath starts at $0.50/GB and ProxyShare starts at $0.67/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Blurpath or ProxyShare?

ProxyShare has the larger advertised residential pool. Blurpath reports 60M+ residential IPs across 190+ countries; ProxyShare reports 75M+ residential IPs across 195+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Blurpath or ProxyShare?

Blurpath edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Blurpath is typically picked for residential workloads, while ProxyShare is often chosen for residential use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Blurpath or ProxyShare?

Blurpath carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Blurpath gates dedicated account managers and ProxyShare gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Blurpath or ProxyShare in 2026?

Pick Blurpath when Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies fro. Pick ProxyShare when ProxyShare is a Hong Kong-based proxy provider offering rotating and static residential, datacenter, and long-. Most teams that consider both end up with either based on price or specific use-case fit.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut