The verdict
Even split — pick on price or use case. We'd pick Blurpath for most teams that need hong kong-based proxy vendor offering 60m+ residential ips plus isp, datacenter, mobile and socks5 proxies from ~$0.5/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
Blurpath vs ProxyShare — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, Blurpath or ProxyShare?
On the entry tier, Blurpath is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Blurpath starts at $0.50/GB and ProxyShare starts at $0.67/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, Blurpath or ProxyShare?
ProxyShare has the larger advertised residential pool. Blurpath reports 60M+ residential IPs across 190+ countries; ProxyShare reports 75M+ residential IPs across 195+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, Blurpath or ProxyShare?
Blurpath edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Blurpath is typically picked for ["Residential" workloads, while ProxyShare is often chosen for ["Residential" use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, Blurpath or ProxyShare?
Blurpath carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Blurpath gates dedicated account managers and ProxyShare gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick Blurpath or ProxyShare in 2026?
Pick Blurpath when Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies fro. Pick ProxyShare when ProxyShare is a Hong Kong-based proxy provider offering rotating and static residential, datacenter, and long-. Most teams that consider both end up with either based on price or specific use-case fit.