Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Bright Data vs Octoparse.

Bright Data wins on 6 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.

Compared
Bright Data logo
Bright Data
4.6 ★ · One of the largest proxy networks with 150M+ IPs
Octoparse logo
Octoparse
4.6 ★ · Visual no-code web scraper with 500+ pre-built templates and cloud scheduling for non-engineers.
Rating
4.6 / 5
4.6 / 5
Trust score
9.5 / 10
8.2 / 10
Starts at
$5.04/GB
$69.00/GB
IP pool
150M+ IPs
500+ pre-built scraping templates
Locations
195+ countries
6+ countries
Success rate
99.9%
78%
Avg response
850 ms
2,400 ms
Founded
2,014
2,016
HQ
Walnut, California, USA
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
✓ Yes
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Bright Data wins on 6 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Bright Data for most teams that need one of the largest proxy networks with 150m+ ips, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Bright Data vs Octoparse — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Bright Data or Octoparse?

On the entry tier, Bright Data is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Bright Data starts at $5.04/GB and Octoparse starts at $69.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Bright Data or Octoparse?

Bright Data has the larger advertised residential pool. Bright Data reports 150M+ IPs across 195+ countries; Octoparse reports 500+ pre-built scraping templates across 6+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Bright Data or Octoparse?

Bright Data edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Bright Data is typically picked for ["residential" workloads, while Octoparse is often chosen for No-Code Scraper use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Bright Data or Octoparse?

Bright Data carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Bright Data gates dedicated account managers and Octoparse gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Bright Data or Octoparse in 2026?

Pick Bright Data when One of the largest proxy networks with 150M+ IPs. Pick Octoparse when Visual no-code web scraper with 500+ pre-built templates and cloud scheduling for non-engineers.. Most teams that consider both end up with Bright Data.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut