Coresignal wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 26, 2026.
Coresignal wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied. We'd pick Coresignal for most teams that need b2b public web data provider offering company, employee and job-posting apis and bulk multi-source datasets with 4.5b+ records., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
On the entry tier, Scrapingdog is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Coresignal starts at $49.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. Coresignal reports 4.5B+ data records across 50+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Coresignal edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Coresignal is typically picked for ["Data API" workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.
Coresignal carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Coresignal gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.
Pick Coresignal when B2B public web data provider offering company, employee and job-posting APIs and bulk multi-source datasets wi. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Coresignal.
We use functional cookies to remember your theme and a single analytics cookie to count anonymous page views. Affiliate links may also drop a 3rd-party cookie on click. Learn more.