Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Coresignal vs Scrapingdog.

Coresignal wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 26, 2026.

Compared
Coresignal logo
Coresignal
4.5 ★ · B2B public web data provider offering company, employee and job-posting APIs and bulk multi-source datasets with 4.5B+ records.
Scrapingdog logo
Scrapingdog
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and Google endpoints.
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Trust score
8.6 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$49.00/GB
$40.00/GB
IP pool
4.5B+ data records
40M+ rotating proxies
Locations
50+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
99.5%
98.5%
Avg response
176 ms
850 ms
Founded
2,016
2,021
HQ
Vilnius, Lithuania
India
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Coresignal wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied. We'd pick Coresignal for most teams that need b2b public web data provider offering company, employee and job-posting apis and bulk multi-source datasets with 4.5b+ records., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

🏆 Read full Coresignal review → Read full Scrapingdog review →

Coresignal vs Scrapingdog — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Coresignal or Scrapingdog?

On the entry tier, Scrapingdog is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Coresignal starts at $49.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Coresignal or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. Coresignal reports 4.5B+ data records across 50+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Coresignal or Scrapingdog?

Coresignal edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Coresignal is typically picked for ["Data API" workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Coresignal or Scrapingdog?

Coresignal carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Coresignal gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Coresignal or Scrapingdog in 2026?

Pick Coresignal when B2B public web data provider offering company, employee and job-posting APIs and bulk multi-source datasets wi. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Coresignal.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut