Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Coresignal vs Scrapingdog.

Coresignal wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.

Compared
Coresignal logo
Coresignal
4.5 ★ · B2B public web data provider offering company, employee and job-posting APIs and bulk multi-source datasets with 4.5B+ records.
Scrapingdog logo
Scrapingdog
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and Google endpoints.
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Trust score
8.6 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$49.00/GB
$40.00/GB
IP pool
4.5B+ data records
40M+ rotating proxies
Locations
50+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
99.5%
98.5%
Avg response
176 ms
850 ms
Founded
2,016
2,021
HQ
Vilnius, Lithuania
India
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Coresignal wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied. We'd pick Coresignal for most teams that need b2b public web data provider offering company, employee and job-posting apis and bulk multi-source datasets with 4.5b+ records., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Coresignal vs Scrapingdog — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Coresignal or Scrapingdog?

On the entry tier, Scrapingdog is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Coresignal starts at $49.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Coresignal or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. Coresignal reports 4.5B+ data records across 50+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Coresignal or Scrapingdog?

Coresignal edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Coresignal is typically picked for ["Data API" workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Coresignal or Scrapingdog?

Coresignal carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Coresignal gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Coresignal or Scrapingdog in 2026?

Pick Coresignal when B2B public web data provider offering company, employee and job-posting APIs and bulk multi-source datasets wi. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Coresignal.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut