Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

CyberYozh vs Proxyma.

Proxyma wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 16, 2026.

Compared
CyberYozh logo
CyberYozh
3.6 ★ · All-in-one proxy and anti-detect platform with mobile, residential, ISP and datacenter proxies plus SMS and fraud-check tools.
Proxyma logo
Proxyma
3.6 ★ · Hong Kong-based residential, ISP and static proxy provider advertising 60M+ IPs across 190+ countries from $5/mo.
Rating
3.6 / 5
3.6 / 5
Trust score
7.3 / 10
7.4 / 10
Starts at
$0.90/GB
$5.00/GB
IP pool
50M+ IPs across 100+ countries (vendor-published)
60M+ residential IPs (vendor-claimed)
Locations
100+ countries
190+ countries
Success rate
96%
97%
Avg response
1,100 ms
1,100 ms
Founded
2,020
2,021
HQ
Russia
UK
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Browser ext.
✓ Yes
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Proxyma wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied. We'd pick Proxyma for most teams that need hong kong-based residential, isp and static proxy provider advertising 60m+ ips across 190+ countries from $5/mo., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

CyberYozh vs Proxyma — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, CyberYozh or Proxyma?

On the entry tier, CyberYozh is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. CyberYozh starts at $0.90/GB and Proxyma starts at $5.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, CyberYozh or Proxyma?

Proxyma has the larger advertised residential pool. CyberYozh reports 50M+ IPs across 100+ countries (vendor-published) across 100+ countries; Proxyma reports 60M+ residential IPs (vendor-claimed) across 190+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, CyberYozh or Proxyma?

Proxyma edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — CyberYozh is typically picked for ["Residential" workloads, while Proxyma is often chosen for ["Residential" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, CyberYozh or Proxyma?

Proxyma carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only CyberYozh gates dedicated account managers and Proxyma gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick CyberYozh or Proxyma in 2026?

Pick CyberYozh when All-in-one proxy and anti-detect platform with mobile, residential, ISP and datacenter proxies plus SMS and fr. Pick Proxyma when Hong Kong-based residential, ISP and static proxy provider advertising 60M+ IPs across 190+ countries from $5/. Most teams that consider both end up with Proxyma.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut