Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

GeoSurf vs Scraping Fish.

GeoSurf wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 26, 2026.

Compared
GeoSurf logo
GeoSurf
4.2 ★ · GeoSurf was a veteran residential proxy provider known for browser-toolbar proxies and ad verification — its site is now offline and the service appears defunct.
Scraping Fish logo
Scraping Fish
4.2 ★ · Pay-per-request web scraping API with real browser automation, JavaScript rendering and rotating ethically sourced proxies.
Rating
4.2 / 5
4.2 / 5
Trust score
8.4 / 10
7.6 / 10
Starts at
$4.50/GB
$2.00/GB
IP pool
3M+ IPs
Rotating ethically sourced proxies (IPs currently Poland/Europe)
Locations
130+ countries
1+ countries
Success rate
99.2%
Avg response
820 ms
Founded
2,009
HQ
Israel
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
✓ Yes
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

GeoSurf wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick GeoSurf for most teams that need geosurf was a veteran residential proxy provider known for browser-toolbar proxies and ad verification — its site is now offline and the service appears defunct., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

🏆 Read full GeoSurf review → Read full Scraping Fish review →

GeoSurf vs Scraping Fish — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, GeoSurf or Scraping Fish?

On the entry tier, Scraping Fish is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. GeoSurf starts at $4.50/GB and Scraping Fish starts at $2.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, GeoSurf or Scraping Fish?

GeoSurf has the larger advertised residential pool. GeoSurf reports 3M+ IPs across 130+ countries; Scraping Fish reports Rotating ethically sourced proxies (IPs currently Poland/Europe) across 1+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, GeoSurf or Scraping Fish?

GeoSurf edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — GeoSurf is typically picked for residential workloads, while Scraping Fish is often chosen for Rotating proxies (managed use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, GeoSurf or Scraping Fish?

GeoSurf carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only GeoSurf gates dedicated account managers and Scraping Fish gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick GeoSurf or Scraping Fish in 2026?

Pick GeoSurf when GeoSurf was a veteran residential proxy provider known for browser-toolbar proxies and ad verification — its s. Pick Scraping Fish when Pay-per-request web scraping API with real browser automation, JavaScript rendering and rotating ethically sou. Most teams that consider both end up with GeoSurf.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut