Skip to content
Head to head

GeoSurf vs WebScraping.AI.

GeoSurf wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Aug 24, 2026.

Compared
GeoSurf logo
GeoSurf
4.2 ★ · GeoSurf was a veteran residential proxy provider known for browser-toolbar proxies and ad verification — its site is now offline and the service appears defunct.
WebScraping.AI logo
WebScraping.AI
4.2 ★ · Managed web scraping API running since 2019: a single REST endpoint wraps headless Chrome rendering, datacenter, residential and stealth proxies, CAPTCHA handling and LLM extraction, billed in credits from a free 2,000-credit monthly tier.
Rating
4.2 / 5
4.2 / 5
Trust score
8.4 / 10
7.6 / 10
Starts at
$4.50/GB
$29.00/GB
IP pool
3M+ IPs
Datacenter/residential/stealth across 195 countries
Locations
130+ countries
195+ countries
Success rate
99.2%
Avg response
820 ms
Founded
2,009
2,019
HQ
Israel
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
✓ Yes
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

GeoSurf wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick GeoSurf for most teams that need geosurf was a veteran residential proxy provider known for browser-toolbar proxies and ad verification — its site is now offline and the service appears defunct., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

GeoSurf vs WebScraping.AI — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, GeoSurf or WebScraping.AI?

On the entry tier, GeoSurf is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. GeoSurf starts at $4.50/GB and WebScraping.AI starts at $29.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, GeoSurf or WebScraping.AI?

GeoSurf has the larger advertised residential pool. GeoSurf reports 3M+ IPs across 130+ countries; WebScraping.AI reports Datacenter/residential/stealth across 195 countries across 195+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, GeoSurf or WebScraping.AI?

GeoSurf edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — GeoSurf is typically picked for residential workloads, while WebScraping.AI is often chosen for scraping api use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, GeoSurf or WebScraping.AI?

GeoSurf carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only GeoSurf gates dedicated account managers and WebScraping.AI gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick GeoSurf or WebScraping.AI in 2026?

Pick GeoSurf when GeoSurf was a veteran residential proxy provider known for browser-toolbar proxies and ad verification — its s. Pick WebScraping.AI when Managed web scraping API running since 2019: a single REST endpoint wraps headless Chrome rendering, datacente. Most teams that consider both end up with GeoSurf.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut