Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Hexomatic vs Rayobyte.

Rayobyte wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.

Compared
Hexomatic logo
Hexomatic
4.0 ★ · No-code web scraping and AI work automation platform with 100+ ready-made automations for sales, marketing, and research tasks.
Rayobyte logo
Rayobyte
4.0 ★ · All proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans
Rating
4.0 / 5
4.0 / 5
Trust score
7.0 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$7.50/GB
IP pool
100+ automation recipes (managed scraping)
36M+ IPs
Locations
0+ countries
100+ countries
Success rate
98%
Avg response
1,150 ms
Founded
2,015
HQ
USA
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Rayobyte wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Rayobyte for most teams that need all proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Hexomatic vs Rayobyte — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Hexomatic or Rayobyte?

On the entry tier, Hexomatic is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Hexomatic starts at $0.00/GB and Rayobyte starts at $7.50/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Hexomatic or Rayobyte?

Rayobyte has the larger advertised residential pool. Hexomatic reports 100+ automation recipes (managed scraping) across multiple+ countries; Rayobyte reports 36M+ IPs across 100+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Hexomatic or Rayobyte?

Rayobyte edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Hexomatic is typically picked for No-code scraper workloads, while Rayobyte is often chosen for ["residential" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Hexomatic or Rayobyte?

Rayobyte carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Hexomatic gates dedicated account managers and Rayobyte gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Hexomatic or Rayobyte in 2026?

Pick Hexomatic when No-code web scraping and AI work automation platform with 100+ ready-made automations for sales, marketing, an. Pick Rayobyte when All proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans. Most teams that consider both end up with Rayobyte.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut