Rayobyte wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.
Rayobyte wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Rayobyte for most teams that need all proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
On the entry tier, Hexomatic is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Hexomatic starts at $0.00/GB and Rayobyte starts at $7.50/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Rayobyte has the larger advertised residential pool. Hexomatic reports 100+ automation recipes (managed scraping) across multiple+ countries; Rayobyte reports 36M+ IPs across 100+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Rayobyte edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Hexomatic is typically picked for No-code scraper workloads, while Rayobyte is often chosen for ["residential" use cases.
Rayobyte carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Hexomatic gates dedicated account managers and Rayobyte gates them on enterprise tiers.
Pick Hexomatic when No-code web scraping and AI work automation platform with 100+ ready-made automations for sales, marketing, an. Pick Rayobyte when All proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans. Most teams that consider both end up with Rayobyte.
We use functional cookies to remember your theme and a single analytics cookie to count anonymous page views. Affiliate links may also drop a 3rd-party cookie on click. Learn more.