The verdict
Infatica wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Infatica for most teams that need solid performance with 15m+ residential ips, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
Infatica vs WebHarvy — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, Infatica or WebHarvy?
On the entry tier, Infatica is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Infatica starts at $4.00/GB and WebHarvy starts at $99.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, Infatica or WebHarvy?
Infatica has the larger advertised residential pool. Infatica reports 15M+ IPs across 195+ countries; WebHarvy reports Desktop scraper, user-supplied proxies across multiple+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, Infatica or WebHarvy?
Infatica edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Infatica is typically picked for residential workloads, while WebHarvy is often chosen for Desktop scraping software (BYO proxies; optional cloud deployment) use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, Infatica or WebHarvy?
Infatica carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Infatica gates dedicated account managers and WebHarvy gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick Infatica or WebHarvy in 2026?
Pick Infatica when Solid performance with 15M+ residential IPs. Pick WebHarvy when No-code point-and-click desktop web scraping software that extracts text, HTML, images, URLs, and emails from . Most teams that consider both end up with Infatica.