Skip to content
Head to head

NodeMaven vs Scrapfly.

NodeMaven wins on 6 of 7 core metrics based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Oct 14, 2026.

Compared
NodeMaven logo
NodeMaven
4.9 ★ · Quality-filtered residential, mobile and ISP proxies with 24-hour sticky sessions
Scrapfly logo
Scrapfly
4.8 ★ · Observability-first scraping API with per-request cost telemetry, pay-on-success anti-bot bypass, and unified Cloud Browser.
Rating
4.9 / 5
4.8 / 5
Trust score
9.7 / 10
9.0 / 10
Starts at
$4.25/GB
$30.00/GB
IP pool
30M+ residential + 250K+ mobile IPs, ~190 countries, 1,400+ locations
Real residential + datacenter + mobile pool, ASP engine with stealth Chromium
Locations
190+ countries
195+ countries
Success rate
98.5%
96.5%
Avg response
950 ms
2,100 ms
Founded
2,023
2,020
HQ
Ras Al Khaimah, UAE
Paris, France
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
✓ Yes
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

NodeMaven wins on 6 of 7 core metrics. We'd pick NodeMaven for most teams that need quality-filtered residential, mobile and isp proxies with 24-hour sticky sessions, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

NodeMaven vs Scrapfly — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, NodeMaven or Scrapfly?

On the entry tier, NodeMaven is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. NodeMaven starts at $4.25/GB and Scrapfly starts at $30.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, NodeMaven or Scrapfly?

NodeMaven has the larger advertised residential pool. NodeMaven reports 30M+ residential + 250K+ mobile IPs, ~190 countries, 1,400+ locations across 190+ countries; Scrapfly reports Real residential + datacenter + mobile pool, ASP engine with stealth Chromium across 195+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, NodeMaven or Scrapfly?

NodeMaven edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — NodeMaven is typically picked for residential workloads, while Scrapfly is often chosen for scraping api use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, NodeMaven or Scrapfly?

NodeMaven carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only NodeMaven gates dedicated account managers and Scrapfly gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick NodeMaven or Scrapfly in 2026?

Pick NodeMaven when Quality-filtered residential, mobile and ISP proxies with 24-hour sticky sessions. Pick Scrapfly when Observability-first scraping API with per-request cost telemetry, pay-on-success anti-bot bypass, and unified . Most teams that consider both end up with NodeMaven.

Other head-to-heads

oxylabs vs smartproxybright data vs soaxiproyal vs oxylabsiproyal vs smartproxynetnut vs oxylabsbright data vs netnutsmartproxy vs websharebright data vs iproyal