The verdict
Rayobyte wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Rayobyte for most teams that need all proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
Rayobyte vs WebHarvy — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, Rayobyte or WebHarvy?
On the entry tier, Rayobyte is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Rayobyte starts at $7.50/GB and WebHarvy starts at $99.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, Rayobyte or WebHarvy?
Rayobyte has the larger advertised residential pool. Rayobyte reports 36M+ IPs across 100+ countries; WebHarvy reports Desktop scraper, user-supplied proxies across multiple+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, Rayobyte or WebHarvy?
Rayobyte edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Rayobyte is typically picked for ["residential" workloads, while WebHarvy is often chosen for Desktop scraping software (BYO proxies; optional cloud deployment) use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, Rayobyte or WebHarvy?
Rayobyte carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Rayobyte gates dedicated account managers and WebHarvy gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick Rayobyte or WebHarvy in 2026?
Pick Rayobyte when All proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans. Pick WebHarvy when No-code point-and-click desktop web scraping software that extracts text, HTML, images, URLs, and emails from . Most teams that consider both end up with Rayobyte.