Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog.

Scrape.do wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 26, 2026.

Compared
Scrape.do logo
Scrape.do
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating residential/mobile proxies, anti-bot bypass, JS rendering and ready-made scraper endpoints.
Scrapingdog logo
Scrapingdog
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and Google endpoints.
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Trust score
8.2 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$29.00/GB
$40.00/GB
IP pool
110 million proxy pool, residential and mobile IPs, 195+ countries
40M+ rotating proxies
Locations
195+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
99.98%
98.5%
Avg response
850 ms
Founded
2,020
2,021
HQ
India
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Scrape.do wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Scrape.do for most teams that need web scraping api with rotating residential/mobile proxies, anti-bot bypass, js rendering and ready-made scraper endpoints., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

🏆 Read full Scrape.do review → Read full Scrapingdog review →

Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Scrape.do or Scrapingdog?

On the entry tier, Scrape.do is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Scrape.do starts at $29.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Scrape.do or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. Scrape.do reports 110 million proxy pool, residential and mobile IPs, 195+ countries across 195+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Scrape.do or Scrapingdog?

Scrape.do edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Scrape.do is typically picked for Web Scraping API workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Scrape.do or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Scrape.do gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Scrape.do or Scrapingdog in 2026?

Pick Scrape.do when Web scraping API with rotating residential/mobile proxies, anti-bot bypass, JS rendering and ready-made scrape. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Scrape.do.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut