Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog.

Scrape.do wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.

Compared
Scrape.do logo
Scrape.do
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating residential/mobile proxies, anti-bot bypass, JS rendering and ready-made scraper endpoints.
Scrapingdog logo
Scrapingdog
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and Google endpoints.
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Trust score
8.2 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$29.00/GB
$40.00/GB
IP pool
110 million proxy pool, residential and mobile IPs, 195+ countries
40M+ rotating proxies
Locations
195+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
99.98%
98.5%
Avg response
850 ms
Founded
2,020
2,021
HQ
India
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Scrape.do wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Scrape.do for most teams that need web scraping api with rotating residential/mobile proxies, anti-bot bypass, js rendering and ready-made scraper endpoints., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Scrape.do vs Scrapingdog — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Scrape.do or Scrapingdog?

On the entry tier, Scrape.do is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Scrape.do starts at $29.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Scrape.do or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. Scrape.do reports 110 million proxy pool, residential and mobile IPs, 195+ countries across 195+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Scrape.do or Scrapingdog?

Scrape.do edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Scrape.do is typically picked for Web Scraping API workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Scrape.do or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Scrape.do gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Scrape.do or Scrapingdog in 2026?

Pick Scrape.do when Web scraping API with rotating residential/mobile proxies, anti-bot bypass, JS rendering and ready-made scrape. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Scrape.do.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut