Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Scraper API vs WebScrapingAPI.

Scraper API wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 31, 2026.

Compared
Scraper API logo
Scraper API
4.3 ★ · ScraperAPI is a web scraping API that auto-handles proxies, CAPTCHAs, and headless browsers, with JS rendering, geotargeting, and structured-data endpoints.
WebScrapingAPI logo
WebScrapingAPI
4.3 ★ · Web scraping API with millions of residential proxies, JS rendering, anti-bot bypass, plus dedicated Google SERP and Amazon scraping APIs.
Rating
4.3 / 5
4.3 / 5
Trust score
8.6 / 10
8.2 / 10
Starts at
$49.00/GB
$19.00/GB
IP pool
100M+ requests
Millions of residential IPs
Locations
100+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
99%
97.5%
Avg response
1,200 ms
1,000 ms
Founded
2,018
2,021
HQ
Austin, Texas, USA
Bucharest, Romania
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Scraper API wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Scraper API for most teams that need scraperapi is a web scraping api that auto-handles proxies, captchas, and headless browsers, with js rendering, geotargeting, and structured-data endpoints., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

🏆 Read full Scraper API review → Read full WebScrapingAPI review →

Scraper API vs WebScrapingAPI — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Scraper API or WebScrapingAPI?

On the entry tier, WebScrapingAPI is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Scraper API starts at $49.00/GB and WebScrapingAPI starts at $19.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Scraper API or WebScrapingAPI?

Scraper API has the larger advertised residential pool. Scraper API reports 100M+ requests across 100+ countries; WebScrapingAPI reports Millions of residential IPs across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Scraper API or WebScrapingAPI?

Scraper API edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Scraper API is typically picked for [] workloads, while WebScrapingAPI is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Scraper API or WebScrapingAPI?

Scraper API carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Scraper API gates dedicated account managers and WebScrapingAPI gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Scraper API or WebScrapingAPI in 2026?

Pick Scraper API when ScraperAPI is a web scraping API that auto-handles proxies, CAPTCHAs, and headless browsers, with JS rendering. Pick WebScrapingAPI when Web scraping API with millions of residential proxies, JS rendering, anti-bot bypass, plus dedicated Google SE. Most teams that consider both end up with Scraper API.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut