Skip to content
Head to head

ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog.

Scrapingdog wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Aug 16, 2026.

Compared
ScrapingAnt logo
ScrapingAnt
4.5 ★ · ScrapingAnt is a web scraping API with headless Chrome, 3M+ rotating residential/datacenter proxies, JS rendering, and AI-powered data extraction.
Scrapingdog logo
Scrapingdog
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and Google endpoints.
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Trust score
8.3 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$19.00/GB
$40.00/GB
IP pool
3M+ rotating proxies across 100+ countries
40M+ rotating proxies
Locations
100+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
98%
98.5%
Avg response
950 ms
850 ms
Founded
2,020
2,021
HQ
Estonia
India
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Scrapingdog wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Scrapingdog for most teams that need web scraping api with rotating proxies, headless-chrome js rendering, and dedicated serp, linkedin, amazon and google endpoints., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog?

On the entry tier, ScrapingAnt is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. ScrapingAnt starts at $19.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. ScrapingAnt reports 3M+ rotating proxies across 100+ countries across 100+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — ScrapingAnt is typically picked for scraping api workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for scraping api use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only ScrapingAnt gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog in 2026?

Pick ScrapingAnt when ScrapingAnt is a web scraping API with headless Chrome, 3M+ rotating residential/datacenter proxies, JS render. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Scrapingdog.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut