Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog.

Scrapingdog wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested Jul 2, 2026.

Compared
ScrapingAnt logo
ScrapingAnt
4.5 ★ · ScrapingAnt is a web scraping API with headless Chrome, 3M+ rotating residential/datacenter proxies, JS rendering, and AI-powered data extraction.
Scrapingdog logo
Scrapingdog
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and Google endpoints.
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Trust score
8.3 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$19.00/GB
$40.00/GB
IP pool
3M+ rotating proxies across 100+ countries
40M+ rotating proxies
Locations
100+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
98%
98.5%
Avg response
950 ms
850 ms
Founded
2,020
2,021
HQ
Estonia
India
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Scrapingdog wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Scrapingdog for most teams that need web scraping api with rotating proxies, headless-chrome js rendering, and dedicated serp, linkedin, amazon and google endpoints., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

ScrapingAnt vs Scrapingdog — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog?

On the entry tier, ScrapingAnt is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. ScrapingAnt starts at $19.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. ScrapingAnt reports 3M+ rotating proxies across 100+ countries across 100+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — ScrapingAnt is typically picked for ["Scraping API" workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only ScrapingAnt gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick ScrapingAnt or Scrapingdog in 2026?

Pick ScrapingAnt when ScrapingAnt is a web scraping API with headless Chrome, 3M+ rotating residential/datacenter proxies, JS render. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Scrapingdog.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut