The verdict
Zyte wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Zyte for most teams that need enterprise web scraping api with patented ai extraction, ban handling, and headless browsing — 15+ years of operating history (formerly scrapinghub / crawlera)., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
ScrapingAnt vs Zyte — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, ScrapingAnt or Zyte?
On the entry tier, Zyte is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. ScrapingAnt starts at $19.00/GB and Zyte starts at $0.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, ScrapingAnt or Zyte?
ScrapingAnt has the larger advertised residential pool. ScrapingAnt reports 3M+ rotating proxies across 100+ countries across 100+ countries; Zyte reports Billions of req/mo across 116+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, ScrapingAnt or Zyte?
Zyte edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — ScrapingAnt is typically picked for scraping api workloads, while Zyte is often chosen for datacenter use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, ScrapingAnt or Zyte?
Zyte carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only ScrapingAnt gates dedicated account managers and Zyte gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick ScrapingAnt or Zyte in 2026?
Pick ScrapingAnt when ScrapingAnt is a web scraping API with headless Chrome, 3M+ rotating residential/datacenter proxies, JS render. Pick Zyte when Enterprise web scraping API with patented AI extraction, ban handling, and headless browsing — 15+ years of op. Most teams that consider both end up with Zyte.