Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Shifter vs Traffmonetizer.

Shifter wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 26, 2026.

Compared
Shifter logo
Shifter
3.9 ★ · Shifter (formerly Microleaves) is a veteran rotating residential and back-connect proxy provider with a 50M+ IP pool and unlimited-bandwidth special proxies priced per port.
Traffmonetizer logo
Traffmonetizer
3.9 ★ · Bandwidth-sharing app that pays users for unused internet, reselling that traffic as residential IPs to businesses.
Rating
3.9 / 5
3.9 / 5
Trust score
8.0 / 10
6.9 / 10
Starts at
$99.98/GB
IP pool
50M+ IPs
350,000+ active users (per site)
Locations
195+ countries
0+ countries
Success rate
97.8%
Avg response
1,200 ms
Founded
2,012
HQ
New York, United States
Tallinn, Estonia
Has API
✓ Yes
— No
Crypto payments
— No
✓ Yes
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Shifter wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Shifter for most teams that need shifter (formerly microleaves) is a veteran rotating residential and back-connect proxy provider with a 50m+ ip pool and unlimited-bandwidth special proxies priced per port., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

🏆 Read full Shifter review → Read full Traffmonetizer review →

Shifter vs Traffmonetizer — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Shifter or Traffmonetizer?

On the entry tier, Traffmonetizer is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Shifter starts at $99.98/GB and Traffmonetizer starts at $0.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Shifter or Traffmonetizer?

Shifter has the larger advertised residential pool. Shifter reports 50M+ IPs across 195+ countries; Traffmonetizer reports 350,000+ active users (per site) across multiple+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Shifter or Traffmonetizer?

Shifter edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Shifter is typically picked for residential workloads, while Traffmonetizer is often chosen for Residential (P2P bandwidth-share) use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Shifter or Traffmonetizer?

Shifter carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Shifter gates dedicated account managers and Traffmonetizer gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Shifter or Traffmonetizer in 2026?

Pick Shifter when Shifter (formerly Microleaves) is a veteran rotating residential and back-connect proxy provider with a 50M+ I. Pick Traffmonetizer when Bandwidth-sharing app that pays users for unused internet, reselling that traffic as residential IPs to busine. Most teams that consider both end up with Shifter.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut