The verdict
Even split — pick on price or use case. We'd pick Blurpath for most teams that need hong kong-based proxy vendor offering 60m+ residential ips plus isp, datacenter, mobile and socks5 proxies from ~$0.5/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
Blurpath vs LumiProxy — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, Blurpath or LumiProxy?
On the entry tier, Blurpath is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Blurpath starts at $0.50/GB and LumiProxy starts at $0.80/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, Blurpath or LumiProxy?
LumiProxy has the larger advertised residential pool. Blurpath reports 60M+ residential IPs across 190+ countries; LumiProxy reports 90M+ residential IPs (vendor-stated) across 195+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, Blurpath or LumiProxy?
Blurpath edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Blurpath is typically picked for residential workloads, while LumiProxy is often chosen for residential use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, Blurpath or LumiProxy?
Blurpath carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Blurpath gates dedicated account managers and LumiProxy gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick Blurpath or LumiProxy in 2026?
Pick Blurpath when Hong Kong-based proxy vendor offering 60M+ residential IPs plus ISP, datacenter, mobile and SOCKS5 proxies fro. Pick LumiProxy when LumiProxy is a Hong Kong-based proxy provider offering a vendor-stated 90M+ residential IP pool across 195+ lo. Most teams that consider both end up with either based on price or specific use-case fit.