Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Browserless vs Scraper API.

Scraper API wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 26, 2026.

Compared
Browserless logo
Browserless
4.3 ★ · Cloud headless-browser automation platform for Puppeteer, Playwright, Selenium plus BrowserQL, REST and MCP for scraping, screenshots and PDFs.
Scraper API logo
Scraper API
4.3 ★ · ScraperAPI is a web scraping API that auto-handles proxies, CAPTCHAs, and headless browsers, with JS rendering, geotargeting, and structured-data endpoints.
Rating
4.3 / 5
4.3 / 5
Trust score
7.8 / 10
8.6 / 10
Starts at
$25.00/GB
$49.00/GB
IP pool
Managed headless browser fleet (residential proxy add-on)
100M+ requests
Locations
0+ countries
100+ countries
Success rate
99%
Avg response
1,200 ms
Founded
2,018
HQ
Austin, Texas, USA
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
✓ Yes
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Scraper API wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Scraper API for most teams that need scraperapi is a web scraping api that auto-handles proxies, captchas, and headless browsers, with js rendering, geotargeting, and structured-data endpoints., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Read full Browserless review → 🏆 Read full Scraper API review →

Browserless vs Scraper API — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Browserless or Scraper API?

On the entry tier, Browserless is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Browserless starts at $25.00/GB and Scraper API starts at $49.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Browserless or Scraper API?

Scraper API has the larger advertised residential pool. Browserless reports Managed headless browser fleet (residential proxy add-on) across multiple+ countries; Scraper API reports 100M+ requests across 100+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Browserless or Scraper API?

Scraper API edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Browserless is typically picked for Headless browser API workloads, while Scraper API is often chosen for [] use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Browserless or Scraper API?

Scraper API carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Browserless gates dedicated account managers and Scraper API gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Browserless or Scraper API in 2026?

Pick Browserless when Cloud headless-browser automation platform for Puppeteer, Playwright, Selenium plus BrowserQL, REST and MCP fo. Pick Scraper API when ScraperAPI is a web scraping API that auto-handles proxies, CAPTCHAs, and headless browsers, with JS rendering. Most teams that consider both end up with Scraper API.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut