Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

EarnApp vs Rayobyte.

Rayobyte wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.

Compared
EarnApp logo
EarnApp
4.0 ★ · Passive-income proxyware app by Bright Data where users earn by sharing internet bandwidth that feeds Bright Data's residential IP network.
Rayobyte logo
Rayobyte
4.0 ★ · All proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans
Rating
4.0 / 5
4.0 / 5
Trust score
7.0 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$7.50/GB
IP pool
Bright Data residential network, global
36M+ IPs
Locations
0+ countries
100+ countries
Success rate
98%
Avg response
1,150 ms
Founded
2,015
HQ
Netanya, Israel
USA
Has API
— No
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Rayobyte wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Rayobyte for most teams that need all proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

EarnApp vs Rayobyte — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, EarnApp or Rayobyte?

On the entry tier, EarnApp is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. EarnApp starts at $0.00/GB and Rayobyte starts at $7.50/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, EarnApp or Rayobyte?

Rayobyte has the larger advertised residential pool. EarnApp reports Bright Data residential network, global across multiple+ countries; Rayobyte reports 36M+ IPs across 100+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, EarnApp or Rayobyte?

Rayobyte edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — EarnApp is typically picked for Residential (bandwidth-sharing pool) workloads, while Rayobyte is often chosen for ["residential" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, EarnApp or Rayobyte?

Rayobyte carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only EarnApp gates dedicated account managers and Rayobyte gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick EarnApp or Rayobyte in 2026?

Pick EarnApp when Passive-income proxyware app by Bright Data where users earn by sharing internet bandwidth that feeds Bright D. Pick Rayobyte when All proxy types with pay-as-you-go plans. Most teams that consider both end up with Rayobyte.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut