Skip to content
Head to head

Hexomatic vs Hydraproxy.

Hydraproxy wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Aug 24, 2026.

Compared
Hexomatic logo
Hexomatic
4.0 ★ · No-code web scraping and work automation platform from Hexact, Inc., pairing a point-and-click scraper with 100+ ready-made automations and scheduled workflows. Plans run $49 to $99 per month; residential proxies and AI automations sit behind a premium credit add-on from $999/month.
Hydraproxy logo
Hydraproxy
4.0 ★ · Pay-as-you-go rotating residential and 4G/5G mobile proxies with 5M+ IPs, a 1GB minimum, no monthly commitment and non-recurring billing for small users.
Rating
4.0 / 5
4.0 / 5
Trust score
7.0 / 10
8.3 / 10
Starts at
$2.95/GB
IP pool
100+ automation recipes (managed scraping)
5M+ residential IPs
Locations
0+ countries
100+ countries
Success rate
99%
Avg response
850 ms
Founded
2,019
HQ
USA
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
✓ Yes
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
✓ Yes
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Hydraproxy wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Hydraproxy for most teams that need pay-as-you-go rotating residential and 4g/5g mobile proxies with 5m+ ips, a 1gb minimum, no monthly commitment and non-recurring billing for small users., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Hexomatic vs Hydraproxy — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Hexomatic or Hydraproxy?

On the entry tier, Hexomatic is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Hexomatic starts at $0.00/GB and Hydraproxy starts at $2.95/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Hexomatic or Hydraproxy?

Hydraproxy has the larger advertised residential pool. Hexomatic reports 100+ automation recipes (managed scraping) across multiple+ countries; Hydraproxy reports 5M+ residential IPs across 100+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Hexomatic or Hydraproxy?

Hydraproxy edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Hexomatic is typically picked for no-code scraper workloads, while Hydraproxy is often chosen for datacenter use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Hexomatic or Hydraproxy?

Hydraproxy carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Hexomatic gates dedicated account managers and Hydraproxy gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Hexomatic or Hydraproxy in 2026?

Pick Hexomatic when No-code web scraping and work automation platform from Hexact, Inc., pairing a point-and-click scraper with 10. Pick Hydraproxy when Pay-as-you-go rotating residential and 4G/5G mobile proxies with 5M+ IPs, a 1GB minimum, no monthly commitment. Most teams that consider both end up with Hydraproxy.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut