Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

IPFoxy vs Proxyma.

IPFoxy wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 3 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 16, 2026.

Compared
IPFoxy logo
IPFoxy
3.6 ★ · Hong Kong-based proxy provider offering rotating/dedicated residential, datacenter IPv4/IPv6 and mobile proxies from $1.99/GB.
Proxyma logo
Proxyma
3.6 ★ · Hong Kong-based residential, ISP and static proxy provider advertising 60M+ IPs across 190+ countries from $5/mo.
Rating
3.6 / 5
3.6 / 5
Trust score
7.3 / 10
7.4 / 10
Starts at
$1.99/GB
$5.00/GB
IP pool
70 million+ advertised IP resources (figure varies across the site; not independently verified)
60M+ residential IPs (vendor-claimed)
Locations
200+ countries
190+ countries
Success rate
97%
97%
Avg response
1,100 ms
1,100 ms
Founded
2,021
2,021
HQ
Hong Kong
UK
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

IPFoxy wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 3 tied. We'd pick IPFoxy for most teams that need hong kong-based proxy provider offering rotating/dedicated residential, datacenter ipv4/ipv6 and mobile proxies from $1.99/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

IPFoxy vs Proxyma — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, IPFoxy or Proxyma?

On the entry tier, IPFoxy is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. IPFoxy starts at $1.99/GB and Proxyma starts at $5.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, IPFoxy or Proxyma?

IPFoxy has the larger advertised residential pool. IPFoxy reports 70 million+ advertised IP resources (figure varies across the site; not independently verified) across 200+ countries; Proxyma reports 60M+ residential IPs (vendor-claimed) across 190+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, IPFoxy or Proxyma?

Proxyma edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — IPFoxy is typically picked for ["Residential" workloads, while Proxyma is often chosen for ["Residential" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, IPFoxy or Proxyma?

Proxyma carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only IPFoxy gates dedicated account managers and Proxyma gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick IPFoxy or Proxyma in 2026?

Pick IPFoxy when Hong Kong-based proxy provider offering rotating/dedicated residential, datacenter IPv4/IPv6 and mobile proxie. Pick Proxyma when Hong Kong-based residential, ISP and static proxy provider advertising 60M+ IPs across 190+ countries from $5/. Most teams that consider both end up with IPFoxy.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut