Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Microleaves vs Proxyma.

Proxyma wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.

Compared
Microleaves logo
Microleaves
3.6 ★ · Long-running (since 2012) residential backconnect proxy provider, now rebranding to Shifter, offering rotating and dedicated HTTP proxies.
Proxyma logo
Proxyma
3.6 ★ · Hong Kong-based residential, ISP and static proxy provider advertising 60M+ IPs across 190+ countries from $5/mo.
Rating
3.6 / 5
3.6 / 5
Trust score
6.0 / 10
7.4 / 10
Starts at
$12.50/GB
$5.00/GB
IP pool
Over 26 million IPs (legacy; 205M+ on successor Shifter.io)
60M+ residential IPs (vendor-claimed)
Locations
0+ countries
190+ countries
Success rate
97%
Avg response
1,100 ms
Founded
2,012
2,021
HQ
UK
Has API
— No
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
✓ Yes
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Proxyma wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Proxyma for most teams that need hong kong-based residential, isp and static proxy provider advertising 60m+ ips across 190+ countries from $5/mo., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Microleaves vs Proxyma — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Microleaves or Proxyma?

On the entry tier, Proxyma is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Microleaves starts at $12.50/GB and Proxyma starts at $5.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Microleaves or Proxyma?

Proxyma has the larger advertised residential pool. Microleaves reports Over 26 million IPs (legacy; 205M+ on successor Shifter.io) across multiple+ countries; Proxyma reports 60M+ residential IPs (vendor-claimed) across 190+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Microleaves or Proxyma?

Proxyma edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Microleaves is typically picked for Backconnect (rotating) proxies workloads, while Proxyma is often chosen for ["Residential" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Microleaves or Proxyma?

Proxyma carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Microleaves gates dedicated account managers and Proxyma gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Microleaves or Proxyma in 2026?

Pick Microleaves when Long-running (since 2012) residential backconnect proxy provider, now rebranding to Shifter, offering rotating. Pick Proxyma when Hong Kong-based residential, ISP and static proxy provider advertising 60M+ IPs across 190+ countries from $5/. Most teams that consider both end up with Proxyma.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut