The verdict
NetNut wins on 6 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick NetNut for most teams that need fast rotating proxies with 85m+ ips, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
NetNut vs WebScrapingAPI — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, NetNut or WebScrapingAPI?
On the entry tier, NetNut is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. NetNut starts at $3.45/GB and WebScrapingAPI starts at $19.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, NetNut or WebScrapingAPI?
NetNut has the larger advertised residential pool. NetNut reports 85M+ residential + 5M+ mobile IPs across 195 countries across 200+ countries; WebScrapingAPI reports Millions of residential IPs across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, NetNut or WebScrapingAPI?
NetNut edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — NetNut is typically picked for residential workloads, while WebScrapingAPI is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, NetNut or WebScrapingAPI?
NetNut carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only NetNut gates dedicated account managers and WebScrapingAPI gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick NetNut or WebScrapingAPI in 2026?
Pick NetNut when Fast rotating proxies with 85M+ IPs. Pick WebScrapingAPI when Web scraping API with millions of residential proxies, JS rendering, anti-bot bypass, plus dedicated Google SE. Most teams that consider both end up with NetNut.