The verdict
NetNut wins on 6 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick NetNut for most teams that need fast rotating proxies with 85m+ ips, but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
NetNut vs WebScrapingAPI — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, NetNut or WebScrapingAPI?
On the entry tier, NetNut is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. NetNut starts at $3.45/GB and WebScrapingAPI starts at $19.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, NetNut or WebScrapingAPI?
NetNut has the larger advertised residential pool. NetNut reports 85M+ IPs across 200+ countries; WebScrapingAPI reports Millions of residential IPs across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, NetNut or WebScrapingAPI?
NetNut edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — NetNut is typically picked for residential workloads, while WebScrapingAPI is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, NetNut or WebScrapingAPI?
NetNut carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only NetNut gates dedicated account managers and WebScrapingAPI gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick NetNut or WebScrapingAPI in 2026?
Pick NetNut when Fast rotating proxies with 85M+ IPs. Pick WebScrapingAPI when Web scraping API with millions of residential proxies, JS rendering, anti-bot bypass, plus dedicated Google SE. Most teams that consider both end up with NetNut.