Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Nsocks vs Packetstream.

Nsocks wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested Jul 9, 2026.

Compared
N
Nsocks
3.5 ★ · Hong Kong-based proxy provider offering 80M+ rotating residential IPs across 190+ countries, plus unlimited-bandwidth residential, static residential/ISP, and static datacenter proxies. HTTP and SOCKS5 support with country selection, sub-accounts, API and a dashboard. Entry price $0.90/GB.
Packetstream logo
Packetstream
3.5 ★ · Peer-to-peer residential bandwidth
Rating
3.5 / 5
3.5 / 5
Trust score
6.3 / 10
7.2 / 10
Starts at
$0.90/GB
$1.00/GB
IP pool
80 million residential IPs
7M+ IPs
Locations
190+ countries
100+ countries
Success rate
96%
Avg response
1,400 ms
Founded
2,018
HQ
USA
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
✓ Yes
— No
Browser ext.
✓ Yes
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
— No
✓ Yes

The verdict

Nsocks wins on 4 of 7 core metrics, 1 tied. We'd pick Nsocks for most teams that need hong kong-based proxy provider offering 80m+ rotating residential ips across 190+ countries, plus unlimited-bandwidth residential, static residential/isp, and static datacenter proxies. http and socks5 support with country selection, sub-accounts, api and a dashboard. entry price $0.90/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Nsocks vs Packetstream — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Nsocks or Packetstream?

On the entry tier, Nsocks is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Nsocks starts at $0.90/GB and Packetstream starts at $1.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Nsocks or Packetstream?

Nsocks has the larger advertised residential pool. Nsocks reports 80 million residential IPs across 190+ countries; Packetstream reports 7M+ IPs across 100+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Nsocks or Packetstream?

Packetstream edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Nsocks is typically picked for ["Residential" workloads, while Packetstream is often chosen for datacenter use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Nsocks or Packetstream?

Packetstream carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Nsocks gates dedicated account managers and Packetstream gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Nsocks or Packetstream in 2026?

Pick Nsocks when Hong Kong-based proxy provider offering 80M+ rotating residential IPs across 190+ countries, plus unlimited-ba. Pick Packetstream when Peer-to-peer residential bandwidth. Most teams that consider both end up with Nsocks.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut