Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Octoparse vs ScrapingBee.

ScrapingBee wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.

Compared
Octoparse logo
Octoparse
4.6 ★ · Visual no-code web scraper with 500+ pre-built templates and cloud scheduling for non-engineers.
ScrapingBee logo
ScrapingBee
4.6 ★ · France-based scraping API with JS rendering, AI extraction, and dedicated endpoints for Google, Amazon, YouTube, Walmart, and ChatGPT — $49–$599/mo plans.
Rating
4.6 / 5
4.6 / 5
Trust score
8.2 / 10
8.7 / 10
Starts at
$69.00/GB
$49.00/GB
IP pool
500+ pre-built scraping templates
Rotating pool
Locations
6+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
78%
99.9%
Avg response
2,400 ms
1,200 ms
Founded
2,016
HQ
Walnut, California, USA
France
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

ScrapingBee wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied. We'd pick ScrapingBee for most teams that need france-based scraping api with js rendering, ai extraction, and dedicated endpoints for google, amazon, youtube, walmart, and chatgpt — $49–$599/mo plans., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Octoparse vs ScrapingBee — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Octoparse or ScrapingBee?

On the entry tier, ScrapingBee is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Octoparse starts at $69.00/GB and ScrapingBee starts at $49.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Octoparse or ScrapingBee?

ScrapingBee has the larger advertised residential pool. Octoparse reports 500+ pre-built scraping templates across 6+ countries; ScrapingBee reports Rotating pool across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Octoparse or ScrapingBee?

ScrapingBee edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Octoparse is typically picked for No-Code Scraper workloads, while ScrapingBee is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Octoparse or ScrapingBee?

ScrapingBee carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Octoparse gates dedicated account managers and ScrapingBee gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Octoparse or ScrapingBee in 2026?

Pick Octoparse when Visual no-code web scraper with 500+ pre-built templates and cloud scheduling for non-engineers.. Pick ScrapingBee when France-based scraping API with JS rendering, AI extraction, and dedicated endpoints for Google, Amazon, YouTub. Most teams that consider both end up with ScrapingBee.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut