Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

Octoparse vs ScrapingBee.

ScrapingBee wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 26, 2026.

Compared
Octoparse logo
Octoparse
4.6 ★ · Visual no-code web scraper with 500+ pre-built templates and cloud scheduling for non-engineers.
ScrapingBee logo
ScrapingBee
4.6 ★ · France-based scraping API with JS rendering, AI extraction, and dedicated endpoints for Google, Amazon, YouTube, Walmart, and ChatGPT — $49–$599/mo plans.
Rating
4.6 / 5
4.6 / 5
Trust score
8.2 / 10
8.7 / 10
Starts at
$69.00/GB
$49.00/GB
IP pool
500+ pre-built scraping templates
Rotating pool
Locations
6+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
78%
99.9%
Avg response
2,400 ms
1,200 ms
Founded
2,016
HQ
Walnut, California, USA
France
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
✓ Yes
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

ScrapingBee wins on 5 of 7 core metrics, 2 tied. We'd pick ScrapingBee for most teams that need france-based scraping api with js rendering, ai extraction, and dedicated endpoints for google, amazon, youtube, walmart, and chatgpt — $49–$599/mo plans., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Read full Octoparse review → 🏆 Read full ScrapingBee review →

Octoparse vs ScrapingBee — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Octoparse or ScrapingBee?

On the entry tier, ScrapingBee is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Octoparse starts at $69.00/GB and ScrapingBee starts at $49.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, Octoparse or ScrapingBee?

ScrapingBee has the larger advertised residential pool. Octoparse reports 500+ pre-built scraping templates across 6+ countries; ScrapingBee reports Rotating pool across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, Octoparse or ScrapingBee?

ScrapingBee edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Octoparse is typically picked for No-Code Scraper workloads, while ScrapingBee is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, Octoparse or ScrapingBee?

ScrapingBee carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Octoparse gates dedicated account managers and ScrapingBee gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick Octoparse or ScrapingBee in 2026?

Pick Octoparse when Visual no-code web scraper with 500+ pre-built templates and cloud scheduling for non-engineers.. Pick ScrapingBee when France-based scraping API with JS rendering, AI extraction, and dedicated endpoints for Google, Amazon, YouTub. Most teams that consider both end up with ScrapingBee.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut