The verdict
Even split — pick on price or use case. We'd pick Byteful for most teams that need byteful (formerly ping proxies) is a quality-focused proxy provider with residential, mobile, isp and datacenter ips from $1.75/gb., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.
Byteful vs Proxyjet — frequently asked
Which is cheaper, Byteful or Proxyjet?
On the entry tier, Proxyjet is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. Byteful starts at $1.75/GB and Proxyjet starts at $0.55/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.
Which has a bigger IP pool, Byteful or Proxyjet?
Proxyjet has the larger advertised residential pool. Byteful reports 35M+ residential IPs (advertised); 6M+ mobile IPs across 195+ countries; Proxyjet reports 75M+ residential IPs across 180+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.
Which is better for web scraping, Byteful or Proxyjet?
Proxyjet edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — Byteful is typically picked for ["Residential" workloads, while Proxyjet is often chosen for ["Residential" use cases.
Which has better support and SLA, Byteful or Proxyjet?
Byteful carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only Byteful gates dedicated account managers and Proxyjet gates them on enterprise tiers.
Should I pick Byteful or Proxyjet in 2026?
Pick Byteful when Byteful (formerly Ping Proxies) is a quality-focused proxy provider with residential, mobile, ISP and datacent. Pick Proxyjet when US-based proxy provider with 75M+ residential IPs across 180 locations, datacenter, ISP and mobile proxies fro. Most teams that consider both end up with either based on price or specific use-case fit.