Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

ScrapeOps vs Scrapingdog.

Scrapingdog wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 3 tied based on independent ProxyLook benchmarks. Last tested May 26, 2026.

Compared
ScrapeOps logo
ScrapeOps
4.5 ★ · ScrapeOps is a proxy aggregator routing across 20+ providers via one API, plus Scrapy job monitoring, scheduling and alerting dashboards.
Scrapingdog logo
Scrapingdog
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and Google endpoints.
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Trust score
8.4 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$9.00/GB
$40.00/GB
IP pool
20+ providers aggregated
40M+ rotating proxies
Locations
50+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
98%
98.5%
Avg response
1,100 ms
850 ms
Founded
2,021
2,021
HQ
Dublin, Ireland
India
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Scrapingdog wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 3 tied. We'd pick Scrapingdog for most teams that need web scraping api with rotating proxies, headless-chrome js rendering, and dedicated serp, linkedin, amazon and google endpoints., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

Read full ScrapeOps review → 🏆 Read full Scrapingdog review →

ScrapeOps vs Scrapingdog — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog?

On the entry tier, ScrapeOps is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. ScrapeOps starts at $9.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. ScrapeOps reports 20+ providers aggregated across 50+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog edges ahead on overall success rate against our nightly Cloudflare/Amazon/Google SERP test rig. That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — ScrapeOps is typically picked for ["Proxy Aggregator" workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog?

ScrapeOps carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only ScrapeOps gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog in 2026?

Pick ScrapeOps when ScrapeOps is a proxy aggregator routing across 20+ providers via one API, plus Scrapy job monitoring, scheduli. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Scrapingdog.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut