Some links are affiliate links. We only recommend networks we've tested. Read our methodology →
Head to head

ScrapeOps vs Scrapingdog.

Scrapingdog wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 3 tied based on available benchmark data — our tests, independent lab reports and published specs. Last updated Jul 10, 2026.

Compared
ScrapeOps logo
ScrapeOps
4.5 ★ · ScrapeOps is a proxy aggregator routing across 20+ providers via one API, plus Scrapy job monitoring, scheduling and alerting dashboards.
Scrapingdog logo
Scrapingdog
4.5 ★ · Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and Google endpoints.
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Trust score
8.4 / 10
8.4 / 10
Starts at
$9.00/GB
$40.00/GB
IP pool
20+ providers aggregated
40M+ rotating proxies
Locations
50+ countries
50+ countries
Success rate
98%
98.5%
Avg response
1,100 ms
850 ms
Founded
2,021
2,021
HQ
Dublin, Ireland
India
Has API
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Crypto payments
— No
— No
Browser ext.
— No
— No
24/7 support
— No
— No
Verified
✓ Yes
✓ Yes

The verdict

Scrapingdog wins on 3 of 7 core metrics, 3 tied. We'd pick Scrapingdog for most teams that need web scraping api with rotating proxies, headless-chrome js rendering, and dedicated serp, linkedin, amazon and google endpoints., but the right answer depends on your workload — read the full review of each below.

ScrapeOps vs Scrapingdog — frequently asked

Which is cheaper, ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog?

On the entry tier, ScrapeOps is the lower-cost option per gigabyte. ScrapeOps starts at $9.00/GB and Scrapingdog starts at $40.00/GB on residential. Both providers offer volume discounts, so the absolute cheapest tier depends on your monthly commit.

Which has a bigger IP pool, ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog has the larger advertised residential pool. ScrapeOps reports 20+ providers aggregated across 50+ countries; Scrapingdog reports 40M+ rotating proxies across 50+ countries. Pool size is one signal — actual exit-node freshness and rotation logic matter more in production.

Which is better for web scraping, ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog?

Scrapingdog edges ahead on overall success rate in the available benchmark data (our tests, independent lab reports and published specs). That said, the right choice depends on your target site mix — ScrapeOps is typically picked for ["Proxy Aggregator" workloads, while Scrapingdog is often chosen for ["Scraping API" use cases.

Which has better support and SLA, ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog?

ScrapeOps carries the higher trust score in our directory based on documented compliance, support responsiveness, and customer-base feedback. Both offer 24/7 channels at upper plans; only ScrapeOps gates dedicated account managers and Scrapingdog gates them on enterprise tiers.

Should I pick ScrapeOps or Scrapingdog in 2026?

Pick ScrapeOps when ScrapeOps is a proxy aggregator routing across 20+ providers via one API, plus Scrapy job monitoring, scheduli. Pick Scrapingdog when Web scraping API with rotating proxies, headless-Chrome JS rendering, and dedicated SERP, LinkedIn, Amazon and. Most teams that consider both end up with Scrapingdog.

Other head-to-heads

bright data vs oxylabs bright data vs smartproxy oxylabs vs smartproxy bright data vs soax oxylabs vs iproyal smartproxy vs iproyal oxylabs vs netnut bright data vs netnut