GProxy Review 2026

Based on GProxy's published specifications, gproxy.net presents itself as a broad, multi-product proxy marketplace rather than a single-network specialist. The site advertises an unusually wide catalog for a provider of its apparent scale: residential proxies, mobile (4G/LTE/5G) proxies, an "unlimited" traffic tier, premium datacenter, ISP static, private and shared IPv4, static and rotating IPv6, Telegram MTProto proxies, and even consumer VPN protocols (WireGuard, AmneziaWG, VLESS). For buyers who want to consolidate several proxy types under one account, this breadth is the headline appeal.

On the residential side, which anchors this listing, GProxy publishes a pool of 15M+ IPs spanning 150+ countries, with targeting described as "by city and operator." Connectivity is offered over both HTTP(S) and SOCKS5, which covers the two protocols most scraping and automation stacks expect. The published residential entry price is $0.90/GB at the 1 GB tier, dropping to roughly $0.70/GB at 100 GB. Note a discrepancy worth flagging: the homepage headline references residential IPs "from $0.49/GB," while the residential product callout and pricing page consistently show $0.90/GB. Because the $0.49 figure could not be tied to a concrete, purchasable tier, the conservative confirmed entry price here is $0.90/GB.

The non-residential tiers are priced aggressively on paper. Unlimited proxies start at $3/day (or $25/month), mobile at $6.90/day, premium datacenter from $0.70/GB (down to $0.50/GB at volume), and ISP static from $1.50/IP/month shared. This day-rate and per-IP structure is more typical of the Eastern-European/CIS proxy market than of the large Western vendors, and indeed the payment options — which include СБП/МИР alongside Visa, Mastercard and crypto (Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT) — point to a provider oriented toward that market. The presence of regional Russian payment rails is a useful signal about the operator's likely base, though no headquarters or founding year is actually stated.

On trust and reliability, the marketing cites "99.7% average uptime," "2,000+ active customers," and "up to 1 Gbps" channels. These are vendor claims presented in prose only; they are not independently verified benchmarks and should not be read as measured performance. GProxy does not publish third-party success-rate or response-time figures, so this listing treats success rate, average response time and uptime as unconfirmed. The stated "2,000+ active customers" is also comparatively modest, which — combined with the very large advertised residential pool — is a gap buyers should test against a trial before committing budget.

Support is a relative strength on paper: the site repeatedly advertises 24/7 support through live chat and a Telegram help bot (@gproxy_help_bot), plus a support email. There is a customer-friendly commercial posture too, with a stated "24-hour money-back guarantee" if proxies don't meet requirements and a free 24-hour test specifically for the Telegram MTProto product. A free trial across the flagship residential product is not clearly offered, so trial availability for residential specifically is treated as unconfirmed.

Where GProxy is thin is on the tooling and transparency that sophisticated buyers weigh heavily. The public pages do not clearly document a formal REST API, a browser extension, or a dedicated proxy manager beyond a "personal account" dashboard referenced for the datacenter product. City targeting is confirmed for residential, but there is no evidence of ASN targeting, and sticky-vs-rotating session behavior is not spelled out for the residential pool (rotation is only explicitly tied to the IPv6 Rotating and mobile products). Company transparency is limited: no founding year, no named legal entity, and no headquarters location appear on the site.

In short, GProxy reads as a competitively priced, broad-catalog proxy shop with genuine multi-type coverage and responsive-sounding support, but with limited public documentation of enterprise-grade features (API, session control, ASN targeting) and no verifiable performance data. The pricing discrepancy on the residential headline and the modest customer count reinforce the case for validating the service with the 24-hour money-back window before scaling. Buyers who need documented APIs, transparent company details, and audited performance metrics will find the published specifications leave too many gaps; buyers chasing low day-rate pricing across many proxy types, and comfortable with a CIS-oriented vendor, may find it worth a trial.